12 MeetGeek AI Meeting Assistant Alternatives for 2026

The AI meeting assistant space has grown over the last couple of years, signalling that more people are transitioning from manual note-taking into AI-assisted notetaking for all their meetings, whether virtual or in-person.

MeetGeek is one of the tools in the space, offering an AI bot that can auto-join Zoom, Google Meet, and Microsoft Teams, plus a bot-free recording option through its Chrome extension and desktop recorder that captures your screen and audio directly.

That mix gives teams flexibility, but it does not eliminate every friction point. Public reviews from G2, AppSumo, Reddit, and independent blogs mention issues around how the bot behaves in real-world meetings, the effort required to fix AI outputs, and the overall complexity of the analytics-heavy dashboard.

This guide breaks down those themes, then walks through 12 alternatives for 2026, from security-focused assistants to lighter personal tools.

Why people look for MeetGeek alternatives (based on online reviews)

MeetGeek supports two recording paths: a traditional notetaker bot that auto joins scheduled meetings from your calendar, and a Chrome-based recorder that works bot-free from the browser.

Even with that flexibility, user feedback from platforms like G2, Product Hunt, AppSumo, Reddit, and long form reviews shows a handful of recurring frustrations, especially for teams that rely heavily on the bot based workflow.

1. User interface and dashboard complexity

MeetGeek surfaces analytics such as talk time, engagement metrics, and meeting trends across a library of calls. For some users this is a draw, but others describe:

• Busy dashboards: External comparisons and reviews say there is a lot going on in the UI, which can feel like overkill if you mainly want straightforward notes and transcripts.

• Editing friction: G2 and blog reviewers note that editing transcripts or summaries is possible but not as smooth as dedicated editing tools, so tidying up recordings can be slower than expected.

2. Support and billing friction

Support and billing are the areas where criticism clusters most clearly. Reported issues include:

• Support responsiveness: Users mention slow responses when meetings fail to record or process correctly, which is stressful if a critical call is affected.

• Cancellation and renewal annoyance: AppSumo reviewers in particular call out frustration around automatic renewals and the effort required to cancel or prevent marketing-style follow-up emails to every participant.

For individual users this is a nuisance. For teams rolling MeetGeek out across many seats, it becomes a practical consideration when evaluating alternatives.

This guide explores 12 AI meeting assistant options for 2026 from bot-free recorders to revenue intelligence platforms.

12 alternatives to MeetGeek for AI meeting notes in 2026

Below are 12 tools that teams commonly compare with MeetGeek. Each takes a slightly different angle.

Fellow is listed first, since it is one of the few alternatives that explicitly supports mid-sized and enterprise organizations with both bot and botless recording options, advanced security features and granular recording policies.

1. Fellow

Fellow is an AI meeting assistant built for organizations that care about accuracy, governance, and cross-platform coverage. It supports both bot-based recording and botless capture from the desktop app, all under the same security, retention, and admin policies.

Key features

• Bot and botless recording under unified, policy-based governance

• Enterprise-grade security posture, including SOC 2, HIPAA, and GDPR alignment, with granular admin controls and redaction options

• Cross-platform capture across Zoom, Google Meet, Microsoft Teams, and Slack huddles

• Ask Fellow, which lets users query past meetings with natural language questions

• Integrations and APIs, including CRM and project tools, plus MCP and API endpoints for pre and post meeting workflows

Pricing

Paid plans commonly start at around $7 per user per month, with Solo plans for individuals reported around $19 per user per month when billed annually.

See Fellow's pricing plans

Start a free 14-day trial of Fellow

2. Otter.ai

Otter.ai is one of the older players in AI meeting transcription, known for its live transcripts and searchable meeting history. It uses a bot like “OtterPilot” to join online meetings and can also transcribe uploaded recordings.

Key features

• Real-time transcription for Zoom, Google Meet, and Microsoft Teams

• Automated summaries that highlight key points and action items

• Search across past meetings and shared workspaces

• Speaker identification and basic analytics such as talk time

• Web and mobile apps for recording on the go

Pricing

Paid plans start at $8.33 per user per month on annual billing for the Pro tier.

Explore more Otter.ai alternatives

3. Fireflies.ai

Fireflies.ai is a note taking assistant that focuses on searchable transcripts and soundbites. It uses a meeting bot to join calls and also supports recording uploads, then layers AI summaries and search tools on top.

Key features

• Automatic transcription across major conferencing platforms

• AI generated summaries and topic based highlights

• Search and filters across past calls

• Commenting and reactions directly inside transcripts

• Soundbite creation for sharing short clips

Pricing

Paid plans start around $10 per user per month on annual billing, with higher tiers at $19 and $39 per user per month.

Learn about other Fireflies.ai alternatives

4. Fathom

Fathom is positioned as a simple recording and summarization tool for individuals and small teams. It records calls, produces summaries, and lets you share highlights, with a relatively lightweight interface compared with more analytics-heavy platforms.

Key features

• Automatic recording and transcription for common meeting platforms

• Highlight creation during or after calls

• AI summaries with key decisions and next steps

• Team workspace options for sharing recordings

• Unlimited recordings in the free tier for individuals

Pricing

According to public listings, paid plans start at about $14 per month per user.

For more information, take a look at this list of Fathom.ai alternatives

5. Read.ai

Read.ai combines meeting transcription with metrics such as engagement and sentiment, positioning itself as a meeting analytics tool. It records and analyzes calls, then provides summaries and insights into how meetings run.

Key features

• Transcription and AI generated meeting reports

• Engagement and performance metrics per meeting

• Video playback and highlight reels at higher tiers

• Coaching style insights based on meeting patterns

Pricing

Pro plans start around $15 per user per month when billed annually, with enterprise tiers from about $22.50 per user per month.

Explore other alternatives to Read.ai

6. Krisp

Krisp started as a noise cancellation app and later added an AI meeting assistant layer that handles transcription and notes. It focuses strongly on audio quality while offering AI generated meeting content on top.

Key features

• Background noise removal during calls

• Transcription and meeting notes without joining as a visible bot

• Call recording options for later review

• Support for multiple conferencing platforms

• Centralized workspace for teams

Pricing

Krisp offers a free tier, with paid plans and workspace licenses typically quoted through its pricing page rather than a transparent flat per user number.

See other Krisp.ai alternatives

7. Granola

Granola positions itself as an AI notepad that improves your own notes instead of relying on a meeting bot. You take rough notes, Granola adds structure, summaries, and follow-ups, which appeals to people who want AI assistance without another participant in the call.

Key features

• Local capture of call audio combined with your typed notes

• AI-enhanced summaries and cleaned up notes

• Templates for recurring meeting formats

• History of past meeting notes for reference

Pricing

Business plans are commonly listed at $14 per user per month, with enterprise plans starting at about $35 per user per month.

Curious to learn more? We've got you covered with this list of Granola.ai alternatives for meeting notes

8. Superpowered

Superpowered is a bot free desktop app that listens to meetings from your device audio and produces AI notes. It leans toward simplicity, focusing on fast capture and concise notes rather than deep analytics or complex workflows.

Key features

• Desktop app that captures audio from any meeting running on your machine

• AI generated notes for scheduled and ad hoc calls

• Basic history of past notes

• Options to expand capacity and features on higher tiers

Pricing

External summaries report that paid plans start around $25 to $30 per month, depending on tier and region.

9. Tactiq

Tactiq is a browser focused tool that layers live transcription and AI summaries on top of platforms like Google Meet, Zoom, and Teams. It works largely through a Chrome extension, which many users prefer over a separate meeting bot.

Key features

• Live transcripts displayed in the meeting sidebar

• AI generated summaries and action items

• Saved transcripts for later search

• Simple automations to share notes into other tools

• Team plans with centralized settings

Pricing

Paid plans start at around $8 per user per month on annual billing for the Pro tier.

Explore other notetaker alternatives to Tactiq

10. tl;dv

tl;dv focuses on recording, clipping, and sharing highlights from meetings, with AI summaries layered in. It is used both for internal collaboration and, in some cases, for revenue teams who want to review calls without a heavy revenue platform.

Key features

• Recording and transcription for Zoom and Google Meet

• AI summaries and multi meeting reports on higher tiers

• Timestamped highlights and clips for training or reviews

• Shared libraries of call recordings

• Team features such as workspaces and permissions

Pricing

Public breakdowns list Pro plans around $24 per user per month on annual billing, with higher business tiers at approximately $48 per user per month.

See other tl;dv alternatives for notetaking

11. Gong

Gong sits closer to revenue intelligence than a simple notetaker. It records sales calls, analyzes conversations, and surfaces deal insights, coaching signals, and pipeline risks. Many sales teams that started with basic note takers move to Gong when they want deeper analytics.

Key features

• Recording and transcription of sales and customer calls

• Deal and pipeline analytics

• Conversation intelligence such as talk ratios and topics

• Coaching insights for managers

• Dashboards summarizing activity and performance

Pricing

Gong pricing is sales driven, not self serve. Independent breakdowns suggest typical license costs in the $1,200 to $1,600 per user per year range, plus a separate platform fee that starts around $5,000 per year.

12. Sonnet

Sonnet positions itself as an assistant that creates customizable notes with tables, concept maps, and tailored templates.

Key features

• Records meetings and produces AI notes

• Templates tuned for sales conversations

• Basic analytics over meeting activity

Pricing

External reviews and vendor collateral describe a free tier, with Plus plans around $25 per month and Pro plans around $35 to $59 per month, depending on volume and features.

Comparison Table

Pricing is based on publicly available information as of late 2025 and may change. Always confirm on the vendor’s own pricing page before buying.

Conclusion

If you are frustrated by MeetGeek’s intrusiveness, accuracy edge cases, or rigidity around ad hoc meetings, you are not short on alternatives.

For mid-sized and enterprise companies that actually care where meeting data lives and who controls it, there is a clear pattern. You need:

• Cross-platform coverage across Zoom, Google Meet, Microsoft Teams, and Slack

• The option to use both bot and botless recording, without creating a governance blind spot

• Security, compliance, and admin controls that keep IT and InfoSec comfortable

Fellow is one of the few tools that ticks all of those boxes in a single product. It gives teams flexibility to choose bot or botless per meeting while keeping everything under a single, policy-driven security framework, which makes it a strong alternative if you are standardizing AI meeting assistance across an organization, not just solving for one individual’s note-taking problem.